Council decision made

Having considered all feedback and the community board's recommendation, the Council decided to approve the bi-directional cycleway and shared path portion of the Marine Parade project.

Council decision documents

Because of their large size, we are unable to attach the documents to this page. Instead, please follow the links below to the agenda, attachments and minutes.

To view the agenda and attachments as well as the minutes and attachments, please follow the following links

Council decision recording


Community board decision made

Having considered all feedback, the Community Board decided to approve option C - a road, kerb and gutter renewal, with a bi-directional cycleway, shared path with raised platforms, speed humps, pedestrian safety improvements and bus stop upgrades.

The Community Board made two amendments for staff to investigate:

  • Moving the crossing point by the exit of the New Brighton Surf Club car park further south towards He Puna Taimoana
  • Reducing the size of the buildouts at the Lonsdale / Marine Parade intersection

Community board decision documents

Because of their large size, we are unable to attach the documents to this page. Instead, please follow the links below to the agenda, attachments and minutes.

To view the agenda and attachments as well as the minutes and attachments, please follow the following links

Community board decision recording


Thanks to everyone who submitted feedback on this project

We received a total of 313 submissions from 301 individuals and the following organisations:

  • Environment Canterbury
  • Spokes Canterbury
  • Canterbury / West Coast Automobile Association District Council
  • New Brighton Residents Association
  • New Brighton Project
  • Pier and Foreshore Society
  • Avon Ōtākaro Network
  • Social and Equity Wellbeing Network
  • Eastern Community Sport and Recreation
  • New Brighton Bike and Surf
  • The Water Wizard Plumbing

What you told us

Common themes from consultation were:

  • Support for the bi-directional cycleway (25 submitters)
  • Support for the bi-directional shared path (23)
  • Support of increased safety as a result of option C (22)
  • No support of speed humps (13)
  • Looking for cost savings by doing the minimum amount of work (12)

You can read more about what we heard in the meeting agenda below, which includes the staff report. To read all the feedback we received, download the submission table below.

Changes we've made following public feedback